On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:47 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> When we hit the end of the arguments we will get a valid -1 return
> from getopts_long.  We should suppress this to prevent confusion.

Does this affect hugeedit as well?

> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> ---
>  hugectl.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hugectl.c b/hugectl.c
> index 0358ce2..902085e 100644
> --- a/hugectl.c
> +++ b/hugectl.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv)
>                       opt_library = optarg;
>                       break;
> 
> +             case -1:
> +                     break;
> +
>               default:
>                       WARNING("unparsed option %08x\n", ret);
>                       ret = -1;
-- 
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel

Reply via email to