On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:05:08AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:47 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > When we hit the end of the arguments we will get a valid -1 return
> > from getopts_long. We should suppress this to prevent confusion.
>
> Does this affect hugeedit as well?
Sort of, technically no as we don't have the unparsed option checks in
this version. Perhaps we should.
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > ---
> > hugectl.c | 3 +++
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hugectl.c b/hugectl.c
> > index 0358ce2..902085e 100644
> > --- a/hugectl.c
> > +++ b/hugectl.c
> > @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv)
> > opt_library = optarg;
> > break;
> >
> > + case -1:
> > + break;
> > +
> > default:
> > WARNING("unparsed option %08x\n", ret);
> > ret = -1;
-apw
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
