On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:47:10AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Yes, that is a concern. It is only used actually for the tests, and I > > don't know if we package those or not. For the utilities we deliberatly > > link against the libhugetlbfs_privutils.a to ensure we have no > > dependancies for those utilities. > > > > We do package them but as long as the library is installed correctly > (which appears to be the case), they should get picked up correctly. >
Actually we do not package the tests for the Fedora/RedHat package because they were choking the build process for the 2.0 release. Because the utils do not need the private lib it will be added to the ignore list in the spec. Eric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
