On Jan 29, 2008 7:15 PM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this is the right point for 0.7.0. We'll still mark > ParallelMesh as experimental and we won't make it default, but once > it's useful we can point out it's availability for testing.
Wouldn't 0.7.0 happen when ParallelMesh is marked as stable/useful? Derek > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
