On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:33:24 -0600 (CST), Roy Stogner 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The one current limitation that VisIt seems to have compared to
> Paraview is ubiquity.  When I wanted to play with the latter, I found
> it in the Fedora repos for home and it was in Ubuntu for them to
> install at work.  There's a lot of people interested in VisIt on
> Ubuntu, but the thread I read suggested that the only volunteer
> packager wouldn't be able to work on it for another month.

I think the real issue was that VisIt bundles even more heavily than
Paraview, and bundling is counter to distro philosophy (for good reasons
[1]).  VisIt trunk recently switched to CMake, so it's now possible to
build an almost fully unbundled version (they still depend on VTK-5.0.0)
without much effort.  For example, I have a build of trunk, with
parallel support, that uses all system libs except for VTK.

Jed


[1] This is also the reason that Sage, OpenFOAM, and others are almost
impossible to package.  I hate bundling, and don't understand why so
many projects insist on it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to