On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Derek Gaston wrote:

>> Maybe we should switch our examples to VTK, and recommend Paraview?
>
> We noticed this a few days ago ourselves.
>
> Is there any chance that we could switch the examples to writing Exodus and 
> recommend Paraview?

You and Ben have the most experience with all the various file
formats, I believe, so if you both agree on something then let's
switch to it.  If you disagree, I suggest some sort of steel cage
match to break the tie.

> More people using Exodus would be good... plus it gets everyone one
> step closer to doing true parallel IO with Nemesis (which, I think
> we should promote going forward with ParallelMesh).

Does paraview handle Nemesis?  I know they do parallel reads with pvtk
files; that was what was at the back of my mind when suggesting VTK.
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to