On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <benjamin.kir...@nasa.gov> wrote: > I wonder if all this confusion is telling us something, that perhaps we've > overloaded the functionality in a pretty obtuse way? > > Perhaps (at least from the public: perspective) we should implement a few > functions that are more clear: > > contains_point(p); // really, i'm serious > close_to_point(p, tol=default_tolerance); > > of course they might use the same private implementation if it makes > sense...
Yep, this is what I was thinking as well. Probably close_to_point() is the more general, so contains_point() would call it... -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
