>> Yep, this is what I was thinking as well. Probably close_to_point() >> is the more general, so contains_point() would call it... > > I like this, except I'd leave tol=default_tolerance in contains_point.
Agreed. literary license in the syntax - I apologize. What I meant by "really, I'm serious" is that the method is intended to see if a point is contained in an element, albeit to some tolerance, but should not be called to determine if a point is just close. And thanks for " homeomorphic to a ball" - it reminded me why I'm too juvenile for functional analysis. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
