On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Cody Permann wrote:
>
> If you have any questions or would like to see our "ParsedFunction"
>> wrapper class let me know.
>>
>
> You know, I specifically remember thinking while picking a generic
> obvious class name that this might be a problem, but I should have
> asked in advance:
>
> Any name conflict problems between MOOSE::ParsedFunction and the new
> libMesh::ParsedFunction? We can change the libMesh class name (I
> think FParserFunction would be a good second choic) if we do so ASAP.
>
I'll check it out right now, but the libmesh namespace and header file
naming convention differences usually save us from these sorts of problems.
I'll let you know if we have any issues that we can't resolve on our own.
Cody
> ---
> Roy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
