On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Roy Stogner wrote: > Anyone have preferences as to whether this method should be pure > virtual (breaking backwards compatibility for users with > FunctionBase subclasses) or have a libmesh_not_implemented() default > (causing runtime breakage when users pass their FunctionBase > subclasses into methods which try to clone them)?
This was a silly question - people with FunctionBase subclasses are *already* going to have to edit them to handle the new templating. Might as well go all-in. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
