While sharing a "Who uses the soon-to-be-deprecated C++ MPI bindings?" laugh with a coworker this morning, it came to my attention that some people (even very boost-friendly people like him) avoid the boost::MPI API as well, if only because of the hassle of adding dependencies (or playing with bjam...) in otherwise self-contained projects.
So apparently there's at least a small wider market for libMesh::Parallel:: Ben, would you be averse to relicensing parallel.h (and *only* parallel.h, of course) as something like BSD, to widen the potential userbase a little further still? Seems like the authorship on it was about 2000 lines from me, 1000 from you. (although I'd also respect any objection from the other ~50 lines contributors). --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
