On 4/11/12 3:05 PM, "Roy Stogner" <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Ben, would you be averse to relicensing parallel.h (and *only* > parallel.h, of course) as something like BSD, to widen the potential > userbase a little further still? Seems like the authorship on it was > about 2000 lines from me, 1000 from you. (although I'd also respect > any objection from the other ~50 lines contributors). No major objections, but what additional flexibility would that provide? No need to provide source for modifications? Although I've never understood distributing under multiple licenses, it seems like that could be a candidate for this portion of the library. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
