On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually > keeping full backwards API compatibility in FEMContext, For the moment, yes. > and I'd like > to hear if there are any opinions from other FEMSystem/RB people about > how long (in months? release versions?) that should be maintained. I was waiting for this discussion as well as any feedback about the API etc. before I blitzed through and updated everything as well as breaking backward compatibility. Personally, I'm all for getting it done now as I could see this lingering, particularly since David said he is game to update the reduced basis support. My plan would be to get all the new API components in place so that others could move to it and then within a week, say, remove the old bits. Best, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
