Certainly at one point we assumed 1d meshes would only have x!=0, so rotating would be precluded.
I think that is still the case, for example in defining the "normal" to a 1d boundary. -Ben On Sep 14, 2012, at 12:09 PM, "Vetter Roman" <vette...@ethz.ch> wrote: > Hi! > > What's the reason for asserting > > mesh.mesh_dimension() != 1 > > in MeshTools::Modification::rotate()? Rotating a 1D mesh seems to work for me > in opt mode, but the assertion obviously fails in dbg mode. > > Best regards, > Roman > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got visibility? > Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. > Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
