On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > Certainly at one point we assumed 1d meshes would only have x!=0, so rotating > would be precluded. > > I think that is still the case, for example in defining the "normal" to a 1d > boundary.
Double-checking fe_boundary.C... yeah, you're right. IIRC I added that case to compute_face_map to enable dimension-independent codes with Neumann boundaries to encompass 1D too, but I wasn't thinking about 1D-embedded-in-higher-D at the time. Should be easy enough to implement (there's a 2D-embedded-in-3D codepath already even) if someone has time. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
