On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, David Knezevic wrote: > Well to my mind the matrix/rhs nomenclature is preferable than > jacobian/residual because it's more generic. For example, I sometimes use > FEMContexts to assemble inner-product matrices that are purely used for for > computing norms, so there's no nonlinear (or linear!) algebraic system in > sight when I do that assembly.
Hmm... I can't see any way to compose a holier-than-thou rant disagreeing with you this time. ;-) Unless Vikram or someone comes up with strong objections, I suppose matrix() and rhs() it is. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
