>> 
>> I'll double check with the latest port of everything, although I do think a 
>> lot of this is self imposed - why don't we use the released fparser package?
>> 
>> The development version uses yacc and makes a *lot* of assumptions about the 
>> compiler!

> I completely agree!  We used the release version in MOOSE for a long time 
> before there was interest in including it in libMesh.  If for no other reason 
> than to cut 15 seconds off the build time! :-) 

I'll let Roy weigh in, but my observation has been that 90% of the current 
build requirements are to make the source compressor/obfuscator that in the end 
produces a single source file… and a lot of the compiler issues I've seen are 
with actually the compressor, not fparser itself.

Glad to hear you are not opposed to this option!

-Ben


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to