On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>
> To be clear, 4.5 is a proper release.
>>
>> The issue is they distribute two packages - the peon version
>> consisting of two files (which we propose we move to) and the
>> developers version for Jose who want to muck with fparser.
>>
>> We presently have packaged the development version - the suggestion
>> is instead we package the peasant version.
>>
>
> Ah, thanks for the clarification. I'd rather package the development
> version, even if we've no plans to muck with it, if only to make sure
> we stay GPL-compatible. Those .inc files are basically wads of
> intermediate bytecode, right?
>
> On the other hand, not breaking on OS X is definitely a higher
> priority, so let's switch back to release if we must.
>
> I like the "include both, selectable at configure-time" option best,
> if it's not too much work for Cody. In exchange I can finally get
> around to reproducing/fixing that Nemesis regression he found...
>
Well my results are still very perplexing:
Using Mac Ports I have installed gcc45, gcc46 and gcc47 - with no other
normal external packages like PETSc or MPI for this test:
trunk with gcc45:
opt - PASS
dbg - FAIL (fparser)
trunk with gcc46:
opt - PASS
dbg - FAIL (fparser)
trunk with gcc47:
opt - PASS
dbg - FAIL (fparser)
automake with gcc45:
opt - PASS
dbg - PASS
automake with gcc46:
opt - PASS
dbg - PASS
automake with gcc47:
opt - FAIL (fparser)
dbg - FAIL (fparser)
Cody
> ---
> Roy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
