On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:

>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Cody Permann wrote:
>
>  So I just sent the patch to John and he wasn't very crazy about the
>> whole direction as he reviewed my patch.  I made the arbitrary
>> decision to turn off the optimizer for the release version and the
>> optimizer for the development version instead of having a more
>> complicated grid of options giving us 4 configuration possibilities.
>>  I figured that most of us really don't care if the optimizer is on
>> or not.  We can't turn it on anyway on OS X and function evaluation
>> never shows up in our timings.  The patch works but he and Derek are
>> really leaning towards just going to the release version only...
>>  What are your thoughts?  Do you want the patch?  Unfortunately it's
>> large again because I had to include one more *.inc file for the
>> release version that we don't need for the development version.
>>
>
> I'd definitely prefer have the release-or-development-version option
> for GPL compatibility.
>

Wait is this the issue?  Are you sure that the release version is not GPL
compatible?


>
> I don't care about the optimizer, though.  If someone else eventually
> does then they can add a configure option for it.
>

Ok - this seems like a reasonable compromise.

I think we should get weigh-in from the other devs.
Cody

---
> Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to