On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Boyce Griffith <griff...@cims.nyu.edu> wrote:
> On 10/25/12 6:49 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: >> On second thought, this idea gets less stupid if your "buddy" isn't a >> human being. We could always do what a lot of other projects do and >> auto-upload a "nightly" snapshot. The last thing BuildBot could do >> after a revision passes all tests is "make dist", date stamp the >> tarball, and scp it to the public server. I'd still prefer just > > One advantage of this is that you have the build system built by a > consistent autotools. Re-bootstrapping with different autotools could > generate a lot of changes in svn. definitely a good point. As it stands now, our bootstrap will *build* autotools on systems where the prerequisites are not met, so that's another approach. Regardless, the nightly 'make diet' tarball is not a bad idea either… I can remember a long time ago feeling a little hesitant checking out people's svn repos just to try building a code. I'm sure there will be plenty more discussion on the implementation after I merge the branch, which I reiterate will be after we polish the next release. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
