On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote > > I'm turning ParallelMesh distributed repartitioning back on! I fixed > a few bugs in the way we were doing distributed mesh element/node > redistribution, and I no longer see logic errors from the libMesh > examples with --enable-parmesh; I fixed a tricky bug in the way we > were doing distributed mesh constraint communication, and I no longer > see any correctness errors in the libMesh examples with > --enable-parmesh. > > Now, I'm not naive enough to think that the libMesh examples are a > great test suite, so we need much more testing. Would those of you > with more rigorous distributed-mesh-compatible-application regression > test suites run the svn head through them (configured with > --enable-parmesh, and executed with as many different processor counts > as you have time for) and see if there's any more subtle breakage?
This is awesome - thank you! I'll test here but my apps are presently lighter than I'd like wrt AMR, so success here is necessary but not sufficient… -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
