On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmm.... we did some testing with this this week and there are a couple of
> issues:
>
> 1. If you don't "make install" then Make.common does not get created
> (obviously not necessary for an example... but that is problematic for
> some users).
>
> 2. If you don't "make install" then bin/libmesh_config doesn't output the
> proper include directories (or are we doing something wrong?). Coupled
> with #1 this means that not make installing doesn't seem to be an option
> for actual application development... but are we missing something?
>
BTW - We didn't report these issues because when we noticed this we all
agreed that we must have been remembering wrong... and that in-tree builds
really weren't supported. Otherwise I would have pinged you guys about it.
Now that I know that in-tree builds should work, I'll help work out the
kinks...
Derek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
