On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm with you... but can't "make" _build_ the example... and not run it?
> That's kind of what I would expect. It's weird that there is no way to
> just build an example without running it. This is somewhat annoying during
> the development of an example.
>
This doesn't add to the discussion, but I've never been able to stand
automake's desire to put binaries in .libs, to be run via a shell script
that mucks with the environment. Naturally, the first thing I want to do is
use a debugger or valgrind and it feels weird to be manually futzing with
the environment and running programs from .libs/.
> BTW - developing an example with in-tree builds seems to be working just
> fine - thanks for the tip! Man that really makes things easier!
>
I hate in-tree builds under all circumstances. ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
