I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in the library yet.
P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9? On 06/18/2013 03:38 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > OK, I've got some time over then next two days and am hoping to release > 0.9.2-rc1. > > David, how is the status of the initial DG FEMSystem interface? Should I > wait on something or tag the last version before the new functionality? > > -Ben > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
