On 06/18/2013 03:53 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break > anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in > the library yet. > > P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9? > > I'd love to include both, but per our usual policy with such things please > throw a libmesh_experimental() in the DGFEMSystem constructor.
OK, no problem, I'll add a libmesh_experimental(). > PS: do you sleep? hehe I'm in Australia at the moment, it's a comfortable time in the afternoon down here. The real question is: Do you sleep!? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
