I'll vote "for" on dbg/devel modes. At least until things are cleaned up.
Cody
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> > I guess I'll vote against adding this to opt: but it's not a strong vote.
>
> My vote "for" isn't a strong vote, either. Ben seems fairly neutral,
> so unless someone else chimes in on the "for" side I guess I'll leave
> it be.
>
> No objections from anyone to me adding -Wconversion in dbg/devel
> modes, though?
>
> > My main worry is that we'll spew tons of warnings from includes
> > further upstream...
>
> In theory we'll eventually be able to shut those up with
> ignore_warnings.h/restore_warnings.h. In practice those are nearly
> useless with old compilers and we're not taking advantage of all the
> control that the newest gcc allows.
> ---
> Roy
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Libmesh-devel mailing list
> Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
