I concur with "for" on dbg/devel
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Cody Permann <codyperm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll vote "for" on dbg/devel modes. At least until things are cleaned up.
>
> Cody
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Derek Gaston wrote:
>>
>> > I guess I'll vote against adding this to opt: but it's not a strong
>> vote.
>>
>> My vote "for" isn't a strong vote, either. Ben seems fairly neutral,
>> so unless someone else chimes in on the "for" side I guess I'll leave
>> it be.
>>
>> No objections from anyone to me adding -Wconversion in dbg/devel
>> modes, though?
>>
>> > My main worry is that we'll spew tons of warnings from includes
>> > further upstream...
>>
>> In theory we'll eventually be able to shut those up with
>> ignore_warnings.h/restore_warnings.h. In practice those are nearly
>> useless with old compilers and we're not taking advantage of all the
>> control that the newest gcc allows.
>> ---
>> Roy
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
>> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
>> Download it for free now!
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libmesh-devel mailing list
>> Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
