OK, this could kick off a lot of discussion, but here goes… I'd like to polish a release this week if possible. Roy'd previously mentioned calling it 1.0, but I'd like to go with v0.9.3 because 1) I'm not aware of anything drastically different vs 0.9.2, but correct me if I'm wrong; 2) In any case I'd like to wire brush the code and remove all the APIs that have been deprecated for ages; 3) I'd like to remove the default comm_world business for 1.0.
So v0.9.3 could be imminent with then 1.0 a API cleanup follow-on. But what about C++11? I could see 1.0 as a 'maintenance stream' where we back port important bug fixes but otherwise leave it alone. New development could occur on a master requiring C++11, unless there is a consensus otherwise. It's 2014 already, and a good quorum of C++11 features are implemented in pretty much all relevant compilers. Specifically for the MOOSE guys, what's the oldest compiler you are compelled to support? -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
