> On Jan 13, 2014, at 12:09 PM, "John Peterson" <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Off the top of my head, the C++11 features I'd really like to use (auto, > range-based for loop syntax, lambdas) don't really lend themselves to > preprocessor detection/macros like this.
If the consensus is C++11 isn't there yet for the moose portability needs, that's fine for now... I expect we'll revisit this discussion annually until the answer changes. auto is one of the things I'd like most, I think it'll give us some more flexibility when refactoring return types, not to mention dealing with the compile-time configurable type sizes. But we can wait a little longer... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
