> On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, David Knezevic wrote:
>> 
>> I think it'd be good to make this easier to recover from, e.g. we could 
>> throw an
>> exception instead of calling LIBMESH_CHKERRABORT(ierr)?
> 
> Would it make sense to just redefine LIBMESH_CHKERRABORT to throw an
> exception (after pulling whatever string info we can get from PETSc
> about the nature of the error)?

I like this idea, but the name becomes a bit misleading then.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to