On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:31 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> > wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, David Knezevic wrote: > >> > >> I think it'd be good to make this easier to recover from, e.g. we could > throw an > >> exception instead of calling LIBMESH_CHKERRABORT(ierr)? > > > > Would it make sense to just redefine LIBMESH_CHKERRABORT to throw an > > exception (after pulling whatever string info we can get from PETSc > > about the nature of the error)? > > I like this idea, but the name becomes a bit misleading then. > I made a simple branch and PR for this, feel free to change the PR if you like. David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
