On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>
wrote:
> Hmm... would it be sane to write a shim iterator class, just something
> to prevent conversion to std::data_type_now_locked_in_stone::iterator,
> and then return a pair of those?
>
Can we just assume that everyone will capture the return value using "auto"
so it's not a problem? :-)
>From some snooping around it looks like MultiMap returns
BidirectionalIterators... could we just make a std::pair of those and
return them?
Derek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
