On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Derek Gaston wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
Hmm... would it be sane to write a shim iterator class, just something
to prevent conversion to std::data_type_now_locked_in_stone::iterator,
and then return a pair of those?
Can we just assume that everyone will capture the return value using
"auto" so it's not a problem? :-)
Well, we definitely *can*, and I'm lazy enough that I'm tempted...
From some snooping around it looks like MultiMap returns
BidirectionalIterators... could we just make a std::pair of those
and return them?
I wish. Those aren't a real type, though, they're what the C++
standards people call "concepts" or "named requirements". But
language support for concepts has been getting deferred for years, and
there's no underlying class you can attach them to.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
