On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, John Peterson wrote: > Since you can call all of the routines and it will just drop the ones > it's not using, that's one way to go. On the PETSc side I wish it > could be cleaner...why have two totally separate function names > instead of just letting the arguments' types determine the behavior?
It's been *that* long since you used C without the ++, huh? --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
