On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> Since you can call all of the routines and it will just drop the ones
>> it's not using, that's one way to go. On the PETSc side I wish it
>> could be cleaner...why have two totally separate function names
>> instead of just letting the arguments' types determine the behavior?
>
> It's been *that* long since you used C without the ++, huh?
I know you were joking but AFAIK, in C you can still do if tests...
void f(int arg)
{
if (arg==1)
// do one behavior, call MPIAIJ...
if (arg==2)
// do another behavior
}
--
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
