On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Shengli Xu wrote: > Derek, Here is the result in optimized mode:
> libMesh0.5.0: > | matrix insertion 1920 0.0688 0.000036 22.60 > libMesh0.6.2: > | matrix insertion 1920 137.5529 0.071642 > 98.09 | That's got to be a sparsity problem, then. What's the behavior like with the libMesh SVN head? And what's the behavior like if you run your 0.6.2 app with "--implicit_neighbor_dofs" on the command like? --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
