Roy,
With libMesh SVN head, The assembly is very quickly.

libMesh SVN head:
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Matrix Assembly Performance: Alive time=0.320177, Active
time=0.301312       |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Event                         nCalls    Total       Avg         Percent
of   |
|                                         Time        Time        Active
Time  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| Bc                            1920      0.0045      0.000002
1.50         |
| Ke                            1920      0.2043      0.000106
67.80        |
| elem init                     1920      0.0253      0.000013
8.40         |
| matrix insertion              1920      0.0672      0.000035
22.30        |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Totals:                       7680      0.3013
100.00       |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

while in libMesh0.6.2:
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Matrix Assembly Performance: Alive time=139.585, Active
time=139.556         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Event                         nCalls    Total       Avg         Percent
of   |
|                                         Time        Time        Active
Time  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| Bc                            1920      0.0057      0.000003
0.00         |
| Ke                            1920      0.2098      0.000109
0.15         |
| elem init                     1920      0.1110      0.000058
0.08         |
| matrix insertion              1920      139.2289    0.072515
99.77        |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Totals:                       7680      139.5555
100.00       |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2008/8/1 Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Shengli Xu wrote:
>
>  Derek,  Here is the result in optimized mode:
>>
>
>  libMesh0.5.0:
>> | matrix insertion              1920    0.0688      0.000036    22.60
>>
>
>  libMesh0.6.2:
>> | matrix insertion              1920      137.5529    0.071642
>> 98.09        |
>>
>
>
> That's got to be a sparsity problem, then.  What's the behavior like
> with the libMesh SVN head?  And what's the behavior like if you run
> your 0.6.2 app with "--implicit_neighbor_dofs" on the command like?
> ---
> Roy
>



-- 
Shengli Xu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to