On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Roy Stogner wrote:

> The Elem:: methods both look good to me.  I'll add those to SVN right
> away.  Thanks!

Oh, one slight change:

It's possible for an active element to have children or for an element
with children to have no active descendants.  We allow the existance
of "subactive" elements, currently only for a brief period to enable
proper coarsening of non-Lagrange elements, but in the future they may
also end up being used in geometric multigrid schemes, subgrid
schemes, or some such.  I'm adding a libmesh_assert() to your methods
(and to some of the existing related Elem methods) to make sure
they're only called on active or ancestor elements.
---
Roy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to