On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Roy Stogner wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote: > >> I thought that the meshes would be enought because you could read them in >> with and without your fix and see that the get read differently. > > I must have misunderstood your test. What I'd proposed was: > 1. take a mesh and solution written with old libHilbert > 2. read and output seminorm with old libHilbert > 3. read and output seminorm with new libHilbert > 4. compare 2 vs 3
Yes, that's what I did, so you did not misunderstand my test. It's just that I though that you would be able to do different tests (which I can't easily do) since you are working on the libHilbert bug and have the possibility to see whether meshes are read in the same order or not. For this to do, if it was possible, the mesh files would suffice, wouldn't it? Best Regards, Tim PS: I'll go home now and read you reply, if any, tomorrow morning. -- Dr. Tim Kroeger [email protected] Phone +49-421-218-7710 [email protected] Fax +49-421-218-4236 www.mevis.fraunhofer.de/~tim Fraunhofer MEVIS, Institute for Medical Image Computing Universitaetsallee 29, 28359 Bremen, Germany ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
