On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, John Peterson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Tim Kroeger > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> LinearSolver::solve_only_on(const std::set<unsigned int>*const) > > Are you sure you don't want to add one more overloaded solve() member > to LinearSolver? ;-)
Good idea, and also I would suggest to rename LinearSolver::print_convergence_reason() to LinearSolver::solve(void) since there is no solve() version with void argument yet. (-; (To be serious, besides from not making things clearer by this, it would, if done that way, require *six* new overloaded solve() members since each of the existing ones should be able to be performed on a subset. But I guess you already knew this...) Best Regards, Tim -- Dr. Tim Kroeger CeVis -- Center of Complex Systems and Visualization University of Bremen [email protected] Universitaetsallee 29 [email protected] D-28359 Bremen Phone +49-421-218-7710 Germany Fax +49-421-218-4236 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Automate Storage Tiering Simply Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful, automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how you can reduce costs and improve performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
