Hi K,

The print_info you're quoting are the parameters that are read in from 
the input file. But you can of course set parameters for any subclass of 
RBParametrized (which includes RBEvaluation, RBConstruction, etc) just 
by calling set_parameters. To check an object's current parameters, just 
call print_parameters.

So, it sounds like it's all working fine for you.

David



On 06/22/2012 03:06 AM, Kyunghoon Lee wrote:
> After checking the implementation of
>
> RBParametrized::initialize_parameters (const std::string&
> parameters_filename)
>
> I figured out I can set the initial parameter values at the third location
> as follows:
>
> load_Fx = '-2. 2. 1.1'
> load_Fy = '-2. 2. 1.2'
>
> I wonder if this is the only way we can set the initial parameter values.
>
> K. Lee.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Kyunghoon Lee
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I used to the following to get the truth solution to see if my model works
>> correctly:
>>
>>      rb_con.initialize_rb_construction();
>>      std::vector<Real>  online_mu_vector(rb_con.get_n_params());
>>      for(unsigned int i=0; i<rb_con.get_n_params(); i++)
>>      {
>>          online_mu_vector[i] = infile("online_mu", online_mu_vector[i], i);
>>      }
>>      rb_con.set_current_parameters(online_mu_vector);
>>      rb_con.print_current_parameters();
>>      rb_con.truth_solve(-1);
>>
>>      GMVIO gmv_io(mesh);
>>      gmv_io.write_subdomain_id_as_material() = true;
>>      gmv_io.write_equation_systems ("truth_sol.gmv",equation_systems);
>>      ExodusII_IO(mesh).write_equation_systems
>> ("truth_sol.e",equation_systems);
>>      return 0;
>>
>> But now it doesn't work since set_current_parameters is not supported.  It
>> looks like all parameter settings are done by RBParameters, and I guess I
>> need to call
>>
>>      rb_con.set_parameters
>>
>> , which takes RBParameters for its argument.  So I created an RBParameters
>> instance and pass it to set_parameters as follows:
>>
>>      std::vector<Real>  online_mu_vector(rb_con.get_n_params());
>>      for(unsigned int i=0; i<rb_con.get_n_params(); i++) {
>>          online_mu_vector[i] = infile("initial_parameters",
>> online_mu_vector[i], i);
>>      }
>>      RBParameters mu_init;
>>      mu_init.set_value("load_Fx",online_mu_vector[0]);
>>      mu_init.set_value("load_Fy",online_mu_vector[1]);
>>      rb_con.set_parameters(mu_init);
>>
>> However, according to the print_info log, the parameter values are zeros,
>> which means the values are not set properly.
>>
>> Number of parameters: 2
>> Parameter load_Fx: Min = -2, Max = 2, value = 0
>> Parameter load_Fy: Min = -2, Max = 2, value = 0
>>
>> I wonder what I need to do to set the parameter values to just check the
>> truth solution.
>>
>> K. Lee.
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Libmesh-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to