As a related question, if my code is running on a multicore machine, then can I use --n-threads to parallelize both the matrix assembly and the Petsc linear solvers? Or do I have to use mpi for Petsc?
I am running problems with over a million elements, and using mpi on my multicore machine makes each process consume over 1GB of RAM. Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks Manav On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious if the parallel mesh is now suitable for general use. > > Thanks > Manav > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
