Yes, this memory usage is for the program on each core, including the mesh, linear system, etc.
I had my fingers crossed for the other tweaks that I had done in my code (and some other in libMesh), but was very please to see it work in the first go. I have run this only for my real solver, but I don't see why anything should change for the complex solver. Although the latter now needs to read the equation system that is now in multiple .xdr files. Manav On Apr 4, 2013, at 9:29 AM, "Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> His was some 450 cores. >> >> All that I did was replace serialmesh with Parallelmesh in my diver routine. >> I will look into the output in some more detail. > > Ahh excellent - so you were reporting the total memory usage by the entire > program? I'd expect the mesh-alone savings to be greater than 5x, but this > makes sense if you are including linear systems etc… in your total. > > -Ben > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
