On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Roy Stogner wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Cody Permann wrote:
>
>> Chances are that Getpot is doing something wrong and well just have
>> to continue digging to find it.  Oh the joy of being an early
>> adopter. :-)
>
> Has anyone tried clang 5.0 on Linux to see if the problem is
> reproduceable there?  I do occasional testing with clang but it looks
> like I'm using 3.5, which I suppose is ancient by LLVM standards.

I meant to type 3.2... which actually *doesn't* look that ancient.

http://llvm.org/releases/ lists 3.3 as their latest release, in June.
Is "clang 5" some Mac-specific fork?
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to