It is based on LLVM 3.3svn. Following is the output of clang —version Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
-Manav On Oct 27, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Roy Stogner wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Cody Permann wrote: >> >>> Chances are that Getpot is doing something wrong and well just have >>> to continue digging to find it. Oh the joy of being an early >>> adopter. :-) >> >> Has anyone tried clang 5.0 on Linux to see if the problem is >> reproduceable there? I do occasional testing with clang but it looks >> like I'm using 3.5, which I suppose is ancient by LLVM standards. > > I meant to type 3.2... which actually *doesn't* look that ancient. > > http://llvm.org/releases/ lists 3.3 as their latest release, in June. > Is "clang 5" some Mac-specific fork? > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
