Yeah - coupling interior boundary elements is what we do with MOOSE. Makes things simple. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:55 PM David Knezevic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, David Knezevic wrote: > > > > Quick question about the new GhostingFunctor stuff: I was wondering > >> if a similar approach to misc_ex9 could be applied to node-to-node > >> coupling, e.g. like in systems_of_equations_ex8 where currently we > >> add Edge2 elements to ensure the appropriate ghosting is provided? > >> > > > > The functors are pretty heavily built around element coupling. But we > > do allow multi dimensional manifolds now. You could create a NodeElem > > for each node and couple those, or if you have surfaces that you want > > to stay coupled even after AMR you could create boundary elements and > > couple those. > > > > Or you could just couple the interior elements on corresponding > > boundaries - that'll be slightly less efficient but it'll work. > > > > > OK, got it, thanks! I'll keep these approaches in mind. > > Thanks, > David > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
