On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah - coupling interior boundary elements is what we do with MOOSE. Makes > things simple. > Just to confirm, do you mean that you add extra "dim-1"-dimensional surface elements to the mesh and couple those? Thanks, David > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:55 PM David Knezevic <david.kneze...@akselos.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, David Knezevic wrote: >> > >> > Quick question about the new GhostingFunctor stuff: I was wondering >> >> if a similar approach to misc_ex9 could be applied to node-to-node >> >> coupling, e.g. like in systems_of_equations_ex8 where currently we >> >> add Edge2 elements to ensure the appropriate ghosting is provided? >> >> >> > >> > The functors are pretty heavily built around element coupling. But we >> > do allow multi dimensional manifolds now. You could create a NodeElem >> > for each node and couple those, or if you have surfaces that you want >> > to stay coupled even after AMR you could create boundary elements and >> > couple those. >> > >> > Or you could just couple the interior elements on corresponding >> > boundaries - that'll be slightly less efficient but it'll work. >> > >> >> >> OK, got it, thanks! I'll keep these approaches in mind. >> >> Thanks, >> David >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Libmesh-users mailing list >> Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
