On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 18:03 -0800, Travis Pahl wrote: > > > Yeah, we remember. But the point he was making has nothing to do with > > > Clinton. You see we are not talking about democrats, we are not > > > talking about bill clinton, so please do not use them to try and > > > distract from the fact that the republicans are no good. yes we know > > > democrats suck as well. That is not in question. It is like we are > > > trying to say that that the atlantic ocean has alot of water in it and > > > you are saying, "no the pacific ocean has alot of water in it." Which > > > is correct it does, but no one here is disputing that the pacific > > > ocean has alot of water. > > > > Ooh! Ooh! Can I? I want to dispute that! ;) > > > > No seriously, I can. :D > > > How about the pacific ocean contains lots of water. Can you dispute that? :0
Yup! :D Now, if you were to say the Pacific Ocean IS a lot of water, I couldn't reasonable dispute that. Since an ocean is by definition comprised of a lot of water, and all water in an ocean is part of it, it doesn't *contain* any water whatsoever. :^P It's boundaries do the containing. Of course, then there is looking at a globe from the S. Pole viewpoint where you see there is only one ocean, not an Atlantic and Pacific. Man my teachers hated me for that. :D Cheers, Bill "the disputer" Anderson -- Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
