Good evening again, Tim!

Tim Bedding wrote to Frank Reichert...

I previously posted:
> > It certainly will make it a sham for those refusing to participate
> > when they are opposed to the US imposing a government process upon
> > them, not of their own choosing. If we reversed this process, and the
> > Iraqis were occupying the US, and put in place an Islamic oriented
> > government, complete with confirmation elections essentially against
> > large segments of the US population that would not go along,
> > then that
> > too would be a sham, particularly more so in our own eyes.  If we can
> > objectively make this switch, then the sham nature of the Iraqi
> > elections take on greater meaning.

To which, you replied:
> The above repeats the claim that the elections are a sham.

Well, dah!

Guess what?  That was, and still is the same question!  I guess
I'm having a difficult time defining what your main point in all
of this actually was.  Help me here if you can.  Did Iraqis call
for this election at all? Some of 'em probably did, no doubt. 
The one's currently so-called 'in charge' did, according to the
occupying force.

I doubt if you read me correctly here in the first place. Since
we seem to agree upon one point, at least, that is, that the
current elections are self-imposed by the US occupying force,
what if, Iraqis said, "Never mind!"  I won't vote. I'll fight to
end this occupation of our country right now and by whatever
means are available?

Think about it for a moment, please.  Would YOU do that for your
own country's sovereignty, and right to self-determination?  Or,
if you wouldn't go exactly THAT far, would you just meekly oppose
it anyway on the grounds that this was an entirely imposed by
some other power seeking, at least in this case, to impose
something that your own people hadn't figured out yet as an alien
and foreign cultural concept?

The Iraqi elections are a sham, and I don't give a damn
particularly if the Shrub "White House" enshrines it or not.  We
are talking about immeasurable military force, regime change, and
in a time and cultural dimension in which very few, if any
Americans understand at all.

I've said it before, and I will say it again.  Yes, it's time for
a regime change, and that ought to at least, begin back home
right here in America today.   We ought to start right here
before we seek to interfere in foreign regimes that largely mean
us no harm at all.  Meanwhile, our current propensity is to piss
off the rest of the world and to mean us a lot more harm in the
very near future!

Warmest regards,
Frank

_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
[email protected]
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw

Reply via email to