Frank Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in part: >Lowell Savage wrote to Dave Laird...
>> I would think that ANY libertarian would say that Bush doesn't go far >> enough. >I would suggest that NO Libertarian would even come close to endorsing th>e >Shrub's budget request put before congress on any terms! There is no wig>gle >room here Lowell... this is blantantly obscene, no need to smooth it over> as >if it could ever be acceptable to ANY Libertarian at all! Frank, I've noticed this tendency in you a bit here. You're writing the same thing as the previous poster, yet you phrase it as if you were in disagreement! >> I suspect we'll find that the details of the "indigent/elderly" will, o>n >> closer inspection, be a similar sort of deal--weeding out fraud and tho>se >> who don't need welfare. >These days Lowell, if you are a voter, and have a body temperature warm e>nough >to be considered alive, and can stagger into a voting booth somewhere, th>en >you are eligible for social welfare subsidies regardless of your position> on >the social or economic ladder. >The greatest fraud of all is the social/political condition of this count>ry >and the lack of backbone by people like YOU to call it as such. Again, you're writing the same thing, but making it out as if you disagreed. Sourly By Inert I, Robert _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [email protected] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
